Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Economics ePortfolio Reflection

          I've learned a lot of things in this class about the world of economics, especially considering my economics I.Q. was pretty low.  But the one thing that seems to stick out to me, regardless of any subject, is the very basics of a topic.  I'm a pretty simple guy.  And what stuck out to me the most in this class was one of our first assignments back in January on the 18th.  We were talking about supply and demand.  We even played a little game where half of the class were buyers and the other half were sellers.  This is, essentially, the very basics of the economy.  No matter how deep into the economic system you go, everything is based in the fact that the economy fluctuates based on supply and demand.
          I'm not sure if there's really any immediate impact this assignment has had on me personally.  I just find it interesting.  Sellers can only sell as much as they are supplied and buyers will only buy as much as they demand.  There are several factors to take into consideration when learning what increases or decreases either supply or demand.  Some of those things include income, interests, resources, government intervention, and so on.  But the reason why I picked this assignment above all of the others we did is because it is the most basic fundamental.  And when all is said and done, the core of anything is really the most important part of anything.  And it's from the base that you build upon and learn more and more about an entire topic.  But it all sits on the base regardless.  And in this case, the base for the economy is supply and demand.

Thursday, December 7, 2017

Music Final Paper: Switchfoot

Landon Bangerter                                      12/07/2017
Final Paper
Switchfoot
    I am writing my final paper on Switchfoot.  These guys have been my favorite band since I was in high school.  They’re from San Diego, California and have been together as a group for 21 years.  The group consists of five members.  Jon Foreman, who is the lead singer and switches between lead and rhythm guitar; Tim Foreman, Jon’s little brother, who plays the bass; Chad Butler, who plays the drums; Jerome Fontamillas, who plays the keyboard and rhythm guitar; and Andrew (Drew) Shirley, who plays the lead guitar.
    Jon Foreman and Chad Butler met each other in high school.  They were on the same water polo team.  Ever since, Jon, Tim, and Chad have all been really good friends and would jam every once in awhile.  Come college, Jon and Chad were in two different bands that had just split up.  So they decided that they were going to start their own band with Tim.  They formed a band called Chin Up! named after Jon’s high school best friend, Willis Chin.  They played a few shows are the San Diego area and it didn’t take long before they got some recognition from music industry veteran Charlie Peacock who owned a Christian indie label called Re:think Records.  The group had decided to sign on with him and they changed their band name from Chin Up! to Switchfoot.  All the members of the band are big surfers, and the term switchfoot means to switch your feet in surfing.  Jon Foreman relates this to a deeper meaning, stating “We all love to surf and have been surfing all our lives so to us, the name made sense. To switch your feet means to take a new stance facing the opposite direction. It's about change and movement, a different way of approaching life and music.”
    Switchfoot starting working on their first album, “The Legend of Chin,” which was recorded in Jon’s bedroom.  Right before the release of the album, Re:think was bought out by Christian giant Sparrow Records.  Switchfoot’s desire with Re:think was to expand their music from beyond the Christian music industry into mainstream audiences, but since Sparrow Records bought it out, their dreams were to be put on hold.  Which was terribly frustrated to Switchfoot.  Jon described it as a time where “half of who we were was lost.”
    Nonetheless, Switchfoot still released their first three albums with Sparrow Records.  “The Legend of Chin,” “New Way to Be Human,” and “Learning to Breathe” were the names of these albums.  “Learning to Breathe” was by far the most successful of Switchfoot “early years,” going on to be certified gold and being nominated for a grammy for Best Rock Gospel Album.  In 2002, a year after the release of “Learning to Breathe,” Switchfoot was asked to be apart of the soundtrack to the romantic-drama movie “A Walk to Remember.”  This invite would help garner Switchfoot a lot of attention.  Four of their songs were featured on the soundtrack, songs that include “I Dare You To Move,” “Learning to Breathe,” “You,” and “Only Hope.”  “Only Hope” in fact would go on to be covered by actress Mandy Moore in the actual movie and making it a cult hit.
    After the band’s success from appearing in “A Walk to Remember,” Switchfoot started getting offers from all kinds of record companies and ultimately signed with Columbia Records.  It was that Switchfoot could finally break the Christian mold and reach out to audiences of all kinds.  Switchfoot met Jerome Fontamillas while touring for “Learning to Breathe” and asked him to join the band.  With Jerome, Switchfoot recorded “The Beautiful Letdown,” the album that finally broke them through to the mainstream.  From this album, they had three hits, two of them receiving major radio play.  “Dare You to Move,” which is a refined rewrite of “I Dare You to Move,” and “Meant to Live” became huge hits and eventually became the staple songs by which everyone knows Switchfoot.  “This is Your Life,” while not as successful, was also a successful hit.  “The Beautiful Letdown” went to be Switchfoot’s only album to be certified platinum, selling 2 million copies.  While touring for the album, the band toured with Drew Shirley, whom they eventually asked to join the band as the lead guitarist.  Ever since then, the five members of the band has been inseperable.
    A couple years later in 2005, Switchfoot released “Nothing is Sound.”  The album presented itself to be more edgy, dark, densely layered, and guitar-heavy than any of their previous works.  The album went on to be certified gold and it produced two hits, one of them receiving major radio play.  “Stars” was the big hit, playing all across the nation while the less successful “We Are One Tonight” still garnered some recognition.  This similar sound Switchfoot developed would stick with them for their next three albums.  “Oh! Gravity” would be their next album and produced a hit appropriately titled “Oh! Gravity.”  “Hello Hurricane” is the album that came after in 2009 and it had 4 hits, the most from the band for any album.  The hits included “Mess of Me,” “The Sound (John M. Perkins’ Blues),” “Your Love is a Song,” and “Bullet Soul.”  The album “Vice Verses” would be created in 2011 and it fabricates three hits titled “Dark Horses,” “Afterlife,” and “The Original.”
    Switchfoot would then follow the trend most rock bands have been going through for the past few years, and that is to produce a new sound that’s more electronic and contains more synthesizers.  This sound would be present in their next two albums.  The first of these was “Fading West,” which produced the hit “Who We Are.”  Two years after that, Switchfoot had “Where the Light Shines Through,” their latest album which they made last year.  That would have three hits, “Float,” “Shake This Feeling,” and “If the House Burns Down Tonight.”
    Switchfoot is a rock band that’s still going strong.  They’re constantly donating themselves to charity events and trying to build the world to be better.  They’re still creating new music and have further plans to release more albums in the future.










References


Saturday, April 16, 2016

Home Builder Term Project

Landon Bangerter
Professor Jennifer Adams
Business 1010
March 12th, 2016
Homebuilder Project Paper
            The responsibilities of a homebuilder can be incredibly diverse.  They vary depending on what responsibilities you deem on yourself.  Some homebuilders work strictly from an office and pay different contractors to perform specific jobs while they worry about finances, inspections, etc.  Some are a little bit more hands-on and perform those diverse tasks such as building home frames and walls and installing electrical wiring, windows, and insulation (“Home Builder: Job Description & Career Info,” n.d.).
            The amount of education required to succeed in construction largely depends on what specific field you hope to get in to.  Monster.com lists such requirements.  If you hope to become a craftsmen or laborer, it’s not really required to pursue any kind of education, although a high school degree and some proficiency in math and shop are of a large help.  I learned all my handiwork from experience of working a construction company, and then obviously learned math in school.  However, my goal is to be in a manager position overlooking home building.  The requirements here are not set in stone.  The usual idea is to have at least some experience and in addition have at least a bachelor’s degree in your choice of construction field (“Construction Careers,” 2015), but there are apparent exceptions to the rule.
            I had the opportunity to interview Blair Bangerter of Bangerter Homes, a local homebuilding company in the Salt Lake area.  As you can guess, yes, he is related to me.  He’s my father.  My brothers, a couple other people, and I work under him and two other co-owners as their laborers.  Blair Bangerter attended Utah State University and graduated with a major in business and minor in Spanish.  He had a little bit of experience with construction, never participating in any form of schooling for it.  And yet he decided to pursue a career in home building anyway.  When I asked him how much his degree has helped him with his career, he responded back with a low percentage of 15%.  What’s more is that he is also the architect for Bangerter Homes, designing all of the homes.  He’s never taken any classes for that either.  His experience simply consisted of his fascination for sketching homes and figuring out what a great home would look like.  Through his own self-taught designs, he would ask other architects and associates for any advice they have on how to improve his home designs.  He does this while hiring contractors to do framing, plumbing, etc. as well.  He will often ask them what they think would be the best solution to certain problems or how to make a home more livable for their homeowners.  Blair has stated that all it takes to lead a successful business is two aspects; Put all your might, mind, and strength in your work and have a genuine concern and interest in each of your potential and current homeowners (Blair Bangerter, personal communication, April 13, 2016).
            It seems to me that there is no specific educational requirement to pursue a career in home building.  A lot of it is determined by dedication and interest, but it is certainly helpful to be knowledgeable in those fields.  For me, for instance, I have the experience and interest in the construction field, but I believe I lack the business skills required to engage in such a career at this point.

      Homebuilding isn’t just limited to one specific type of builder.  In fact, there are three different types of homebuilders.  One is the custom homebuilder.  This is the type of builder Blair Bangerter is.  The potential homeowner will first buy a lot, usually from a specific homebuilding company, and work with those builders.  If they don’t already have an architect, the builders and owner will find one and pay them to design their own.  The built of the home in this scenario is specific to the want of the homeowner.  Before construction is even begun, the homebuilder, homeowner, and architect go over specific desires wanted for the home, such as size, style, features and creative touches (“Home Builders – Understanding the difference between a Custom Builder, a Spec Builder and Tract Builders,” n.d.).

            The next type of builder is the spec homebuilder.  Unlike custom homebuilders, spec homebuilders build according to their own designs.  Without a perspective homeowner, they will start building their own type of home.  Usually a buyer will come along after the home is completely finished, but every once in a while a purchase will be made during the construction of house.  Sometimes working with customers on custom homes can be really stressful, so for those construction managers that want to avoid those difficult situations, they’ll more than likely build spec homes.  These are not your average cookie-cutter houses.  Often these types of builders like to throw in their own unique tastes and work in the construction process (“Custom v. Spec v. Tract Homes,” 2016).

            The tract homebuilder is the third and final type of homebuilder.  Now this is the definition of a cookie-cutter homebuilder.  Leslie Mann from the Chicago Tribune (2010) explains that instead of focusing on quality, unlike the other two builders, this one shoots for quantity.  Interestingly enough, Blair Bangerter’s father and my grandfather, former Utah Governor Norm Bangerter, was a tract homebuilder.  The idea is to build them quick and let people buy them quick.  Usually the advantage here is price.  A lot these houses look incredibly similar, but they usually tend to be cheaper than any of the other types of homes.

            For my personal preference, my goal is to be a custom homebuilder.  While there are certainly some desirable aspects to the other types of builders, I really enjoy working with people and helping them live a dream, in this case living in their supposed dream house with their own unique, personal touches.

            A career in home building certainly has its fair shares of pros and cons.  Learningpath.org lists such pros and cons.  From a very general standpoint, the pay is incredibly good.  The average wage is high.  The median annual salary as of May 2014 was $86,000.  One of my personal favorite aspects about this career is that it’s not solely an office job.  You’ll certainly have an office, but you will often be required to visit with other contractors, make visits with the city, and visit your various jobs to make sure construction is going according to plan.  It’s something new every day.  It keeps things fresh and interesting.  There’s also a sense of accomplishment you receive upon seeing the completion of a home and finally allowing a homeowner live in something you created.
            Unfortunately, like any career, there are some downsides to being a homebuilder.  There are certainly going to be some days where work will be longer than usual due to situational circumstances.  The workload would probably require you to multitask, which could be really stressful for some.  There will probably several instances of unexpected occurrences, delays, and emergencies.  Not to mention the amount of work you have could inconsistently depend on the economy (such as the housing market crash in 2008).  And every so often, injuries could occur in the workplace.  Apparently, about 4% of people working in the construction industry experienced an injury or illness back in 2013 (“Pros and Cons of a Career in Home Building,” n.d.).
            The outlook for the field of construction management is pretty good.  Within the next 10 years, bls.gov has projected that job opportunities in that field will grow about 5% percent.  As of 2014, there were 373,200 construction management jobs in the country.  The future is looking fairly bright for this specific field (Construction Managers, 2015), as long as you’re able to deal with all the cons that follow it anyway.
            I’m very confident with my fit in this field.  Working for Bangerter Homes as a laborer has been incredibly informative.  I really enjoy talking to different contractors and going over building plans.  What makes it even more rewarding is being able to stand back after you’re finished with a project and evaluate your work.  I’ve been with the business for a while and have learned a lot.  My older brother and I have been talking about going into business together as homebuilders once I’m done with school.  He’s already had a lot of experience in building and even selling as a real estate agent.  I’ve enjoyed every minute of investigating these unique sources and learning more about the homebuilding industry.  Performing all of this research has been incredibly helpful and has only solidified my desire to be a homebuilder.  I can only have faith that the future in homebuilding is as bright as it seems to be.



Sources
1.     Home Builder: Job Description & Career Info.  Study.com.  Retrieved from http://study.com/articles/Home_Builder_Job_Description_and_Information_About_Starting_a_Career_as_a_Home_Builder.html
2.     (2015).  Construction Careers.  Monster.  Retrieved from http://www.monster.com/construction-careers
3.     Pros and Cons of a Career in Home Building.  LearningPath.org.  Retrieved from http://learningpath.org/articles/Home_Builder_Career_Info.html
4.     (2015).  Construction Managers.  Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm
5.     Home Builders – Understanding the difference between a Custom Builder, a Spec Builder and Tract Builders.  Peak Construction Company.  Retrieved from http://peakconstructionco.com/blog/home-builders-understanding-the-difference-between-a-custom-builder-a-spec-builder-and-tract-builders/
6.     (2016).  Custom v. Spec v. Tract Homes.  Shelia Conkling Jonesboro Real Estate & New Construction.  Retrieved from http://www.neahomes.com/custom-v-spec-v-tract-homes.html

7.     Mann, Leslie (2010).  Custom, spec or tract: Which house fits you?  Chicago Tribune.  Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-07-02/classified/ct-home-0702-custom-spec-homes-20100702_1_custom-house-spec-new-house

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Acting Project

Landon Bangerter
Professor Zac Curtis
Acting 1
March 1, 2016
The Last Five Years Critique
            “The Last Five Years” is probably one of the more unique plays I’ve ever seen.  It tells the story of how a young couple first meets and finally splits apart.  There’s a catch though.  It tells both characters’ stories in two completely different time frames at the same time.  From our male protagonist’s perspective, performed terrifically by Trevor Dean, it starts from the past to the supposed present.  From our female protagonist’s perspective, it starts in the present and works its way to the origin, essentially both switching positions at the end of the play.
            I must admit, it was very confusing; almost to a fault.  I understand that the play is trying to go for a unique form to tell its story, and while it does technically succeed, it’s lost me.  Both characters mean well, but I couldn’t help but feel it would’ve been more emotionally resonate if both characters had been on stage with each other the whole time.  I understand that when you do that, you lose the distinctive prowess attempting to be established here, but in my opinion, it would have been better off trying to get these leads to connect physically, aiding in the emotional connection as well.  And while the finale is actually genuinely touching, I feel it would have been so much more powerful had there been more of a developed, established connection between our characters.
            One of the things I have to note about this play is its music.  I was completely blown away by it.  The mixture of violins and cellos with piano, bass, and finger-picking guitar playing is absolutely breathtaking.  I could’ve sat there and listened to solely the music the whole time and I would have been completely fine with the production.
           I very much liked the way the play was designed.  Its set was very up-close and personal.  They made sure they made good use of the Grand Theatre’s fantastic acoustics.  Everything was formed terrifically.  It was simple, not overbearing, and direct.  The positioning of the band was great too.  Having them formed as a sort of backdrop with almost a sort of mist wall (how did they do that by the way?) was very impalpable.  It was elusive.  The lighting design for the stage had me absolutely floored.  They used a lot purple and green lighting that oftentimes seemed to bounce off of nothing.  I sat there and frequently thought to myself, “How in the world do they make the lights do that?”  It was absolutely stunning.  Overall, I sure enjoyed viewing this assembly.
            As mentioned before, Trevor Dean, the actor who played our male lead Jamie, was fantastic.  His whole performance felt totally natural.  The way he talked and moved felt totally intuitive.  He stole the show.  That’s not to say that Ashley Gardner, the actor who played our female lead Cathy, also didn’t do a great job.  She obviously has a beautiful voice that’s hard to compete with.  However, I did feel like her acting wasn’t as strong, especially in contrast to Dean.  There was quite a few times where I could tell that she wasn’t totally into the role as much as she could have been.  Sometimes it felt like she was singing the lines because she had a great voice, and not totally feeling her character.
            Overall, I did rather enjoy this play.  If it had been my play, I would have done things a little bit differently but my jaw was on the floor watching the physical production in play.  I just wished the story telling was done in a more emotionally fastened way instead of venturing to wow us with its unique form of tale.  But I thought it was good play in general and one that I’m sure plenty of other people would enjoy as well.

REFLECTION
When I look back and think about this play, I'm charmed by the fact of how honest it is.  The whole play is about falling in love and falling out of it, happening simultaneously by two different people.  It's two experiences that we all encounter at some point in our lives.  This production helps reiterate the fact how wonderful it is to fall in love and feel something totally special for another person.  On the other hand, we're reminded how absolutely heartbreaking it is when things don't work out.  At one point or another, a chord is bound to be struck.  Whether it's happening to you or somebody else, we should have the capacity to feel remorse and be willing to console the pain, whether it's our own or someone else's.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Steven Spielberg Auteur Final Project

Steven Spielberg: Personal Film Director
Steven Spielberg is one of the most acknowledged directors in recent American cinema history.  Not only is he one of the wealthiest filmmakers in the world, but he is artistically successful as well.  He has directed, produced, and written numerous films.  He first drew the attention of his peers in 1972, and quickly released both Duel and The Sugarland Express in 1974.  However, he gained large public attention after the blockbuster release of the movie Jaws.  
    Spielberg was born on December 18, 1946, in Cincinnati, Ohio.  His mother, Leah Posner, was a concert pianist and a restaurateur.  His father, Arnold Spielberg, was an electrical engineer involved in the development of computers.    In 1950, his family moved to Haddon Township, New Jersey when his father took a job with RCA. Three years later, the family moved to Phoenix, Arizona where Spielberg attended Hebrew school from 1953 to 1957, in classes taught by Rabbi Albert L. Lewis.  
    Spielberg's’ earliest movie was a home movie of a trainwreck using his own toy train set.  He then followed that with several 8mm “adventure” films.  In 1958, as a boy scout he made a nine-minute western using his father's broken 8mm camera called The Last Gunfight.  In 1963, at age 16, he directed a 140 minute science fiction movie called Firelight.  Firelight,  which would serve as his inspiration for Close Encounters Of The Third Kind,  cost $500 to make and was shown at a local theatre for one night, earning back its cost.  Spielberg’s parents divorced while he was still in high school, which he graduated in 1965, causing the inspiration to one of the recurring themes in his films.  
    After he graduated he was rejected from USC film school for poor grades, but was accepted to California State University at Long Beach, where he majored in English.  He later dropped out of college after making Amblin’, a 26 minute, 35 mm film in which he wrote and directed.  That movie won many awards, garnering the attention of studio VP Sidney Sheinberg, who then offered him a 7 year directing contract, making Spielberg the youngest director to ever get a long term directing deal with a major Hollywood studio.    His first professional TV job came when he was hired to direct one of the segments for the 1969 pilot episode of Night Gallery.
Spielberg has had an incredibly successful career.  He is considered by many to be one of, if not the greatest, director in cinema history.  He has been nominated for seven Academy Awards for Best Director, two of which he won for Schindler’s List and Saving Private Ryan.  Nine of his films have been nominated for Best Picture at the Academy Awards, with Schindler’s List winning one.  In 1995, Spielberg received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Film Institute and in 2008 was honored the Cecil B. DeMille Award at the Golden Globes.  Many directors have claimed Spielberg to be one of their main influences, directors such as Quentin Tarantino, J.J. Abrams, Ridley Scott, Peter Jackson, and James Cameron.  Other famous directors that have said they were huge fans of Spielberg’s works include Stanley Kubrick, Martin Scorsese, David Lynch, Ingmar Bergman, and Roman Polanski.
Spielberg, like many other directors want to make their movies distinct. They do this by using strange shot angles, transitions, themes, characters, designs, music, etc. They each have unique techniques or styles. Spielberg has a few things that can be said to be a style of his own. He has what is known as a “spielberg face” appear in his films.  He uses certain types of music.  He has recurring themes such as: the depiction of divorced couples, issues with fathers, the discovery of something extra-ordinary, and the “rear-view mirror”scene in most of his movies. For example, in Duel and Bridge of Spies, both main characters look through a rear-view mirror. In War of the Worlds, Dakota Fanning, the little girl, is in danger and her dad is trying to keep her safe. In E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, an alien is discovered and befriended.   
As stated before, music is a big part of what makes Spielberg’s movies recognizable.  Steven Spielberg once said in an interview that John Williams is half the reason why his movies are so great.  With the exception of two movies, legendary film composer John Williams has done every single one of Steven Spielberg’s movies.  The two movies he didn’t do are The Color Purple, and Bridge of Spies.  Because he uses him in all of his movies, the style of music in his movies are different from other directors.  This can be widely attributed to John Williams’ style of music writing.
John Williams said that he doesn’t like to add in computers or synthesizers to his music.  He’s so used to using symphonic orchestrated music in his scores, he considers it his specialty and has not looked back.  This is the main reason why music contributes to Spielberg's auteurism. The music in his movies are usually grand and symphonic, almost as if the whole world can hear it.    Something else that John Williams incorporates in his music is using the main theme song of the movie at certain moments.  The most common use of this is whenever a triumphant moment for a character happens in the movie.
A couple of big examples is in Raiders of the Lost Ark. The moment when Indiana Jones escapes from the native americans at the opening of the movie, he hops on the plane and flies away.  The main theme song plays at this moment, signifying a grand moment for the antagonist.  Another example of music being used to express a grand or important moment is with Schindler’s List.  When Oskar Schindler frees the Jews from the concentration camp, it’s obvious that it was a very triumphant moment for him, so the main theme song plays at the moment when they’re giving their gratitude towards him.
In Artificial Intelligence, also known as AI, Spielberg uses an over the shoulder shot many times.  When David, the main character, is speaking to Gigolo Joe, David takes up most of the frame. Spielberg uses this technique to claim that one character is more important than the other. Spielberg even takes this to the next level by leaving only a corner of the frame for the other character, thus creating a claustrophobic effect.
Father issues is a very common theme used in a lot of Spielberg’s films.  As stated before, his parents divorced when he was young and in his high school.  Spielberg always blamed his father for the divorce.  He claims that it was easier to blame him because he was usually absent in a lot of his life.  He considers his father a workaholic.  So for the next several years, Spielberg built anger and malice towards his father.  It’s obvious this experience influenced a lot of his films.  In E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial, Elliot’s father is noticeably absent throughout the whole film.  In Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Indiana’s father is a sort of workaholic, focusing more on his work than his son.  The same can be said in Hook, with Peter Banning being considered “married to his work,” and missing his son’s baseball game.
Spielberg even finds a way to issue this sort of element in movies that don’t even have fathers.  In Jurassic Park, Dr. Grant has always had a sort of distaste towards kids, so when the time comes for him to serve as a father figure to these two kids, he’s reluctant and doesn’t want it.  In Schindler’s List, Oskar Schindler openly expresses with his wife that he doesn’t want to have kids.  Even in some of his films, Spielberg implements the divorced factor in parent relationships.  This includes E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial, Catch Me if You Can, and War of the Worlds.
It wasn’t until fifteen years after the divorce that Spielberg’s father came back into his life.  Spielberg and his father reconciled and now they’re actively a part of each other’s lives.  Ever since this event, Spielberg changed the way he handled father issues in his films.  Father’s are now generally given a more heroic role in his films.  In Catch Me if You Can, Frank Abignale, Jr. looks up to his father a lot and serves as an inspiration for him to be successful.  At one point in the movie, he even buys his father a brand new car.  In War of the Worlds when aliens attack the world, Ray goes through great lengths and does whatever it takes to protect his children.  And in Lincoln when Mary Todd Lincoln forbids her son's desire to go fight in the war, Abraham Lincoln stands up and even argues with his wife for his son to go out and serve in the army.  Conclusively, the thing that’s nice about this auteur is that virtually one way or another, it’s relatable to just about anybody.  Whether you hate your dad or love him, there’s a handful of Spielberg films for both sides of the discussion that go hand in hand with this topic.
Spielberg’s auteurs are pretty subtle.  They’re not as obvious as other auteur directors such as Wes Anderson or Quentin Tarantino, but they are there.  They’re just a little more particular.  The charm of Spielberg is how diverse his movies are.  From the heart-shattering World War II drama Schindler’s List to the horror summer-blockbuster Jaws, he’s been known to have a varying resume.  Nonetheless, his auteurs are present in all of his movies in careful and masterful fashion.
Works Cited


Read by Shayna Taylor